Tuesday, 24 May 2016

Gita , Mahabharata and their contemporary relevance,......A national perspective.



               
                                        
And  Duryodhana said that he would wipe the existence of the Pandavas from the face of the earth  as he refused to  allow even a small part of the kingdom which the latter rightfully deserved as the heirs of Pandu , the late brother of the King and  the father of the five Pandavas , of which Arjuna was one . Such obstinacy on the part of prince Duryodhna brought the nation close to a war between the cousins. And while the wise in the court advised the king against wilfulness of Duryodhna and the undesirability of a war, the King’s fondness of his son had the better of the wise counsel that he received. Dhritrashtra was a king blind at birth and depended on Sanjay who had the divine attribute to see events of distant places sitting by the side of the blind king in Hastinapur, the capitol of the Kingdom. And though the majority of the wise in the King’s court felt that the Pandavas were being treated unjustly, the King’s bondage with his son made bigger his blindness.  Sanjay’s sympathies also lay with the victimized Pandu Princes. 
Duryodhna over convinced of the might of his army wanted to thrust a war on the Pandavas , which he eventually did and now the two armies were face to face at Kurukshetra. The kauravas’ eagle shaped formation with the mightiest of warriors now stood before a smaller army of the Pandavas and both Arjuna and Duryodhana appeared visibly disturbed on the eve of this war.  Duryodhana went close to the commander in chief of his army, Bhishm and started heaping praise on the attributes of the great warriors on his side, with a view to cover his weakness that arose from guilt and fear of the matching might of the Pandavas . His conduct bore similarity with a person entering a darkroom whistling to fight his fear. Arjuna too was disturbed and asked his friend, guide and charioteer in this war Krishna, to take the chariot between the two forces. Once the chariot had arrived there, Arjuna became philosophical and started losing interest in the objective that had brought the two armies face to face. And now his justifications for giving the Kauravas a walkover commenced. He saw the impending war as an exercise in futility. He saw no reason for killing his own kin for the sake of the lost kingdom. He had tremendous affection and respect for his grand uncle Bhishm and his teacher Dronacharya who were fighting war on the side of the Kauravas with their individual identities fully merged with the army they represented and though the two had great love for Arjuna their allegiance to the army of which they were a part now was greater than such. The stance of the two armies on the battle field was principled and had no scope for individual considerations. And while Duryodhana embarrassingly continued illuminating the suns in his army as a measure to reinforce his confidence, emotions had now assumed charge of Arjuna who threw his bough and started citing ethical reasons for not going to war. Krishna the incarnate who was serving as his charioteer on the battlefield maintained a stoic silence sometimes interrupted by a smile and did not respond till the time Arjuna was totally exhausted. Arjuna’s personality, it appeared was completely disorganized and required wise organization but that was possible only when he was ready for such. When days before the war, Krishna who was at home with both Duryodhana and Arjun, offered them a choice between his army and himself, Duryodhan opted for his army while Arjuna preferred him. Hence while Duryodhan sought backing of Krishna’s mighty army Arjuna sought guidance of his wisdom. The illogic of Arjuna’s contentions been exhausted, he now knelt before his charioteer as a disciple would before guru and a believer before God in complete submission for guidance in conflict.
Krishna now took charge of Arjuna as the mind in such tests assumes charge of the senses and itself submits to buddhi . Krishna now started his reenunciation of the ancient knowledge that organized individuals, families, societies, nations and humankind. He brought to Arjuna the knowledge of the ancient art known to the rishis and the sages, the art to become masters of situations than to become their slaves. Gita was now being retold in the context of the great battle of Mahabharata. And as Krishna progressed with his discourse, Arjuna’s countenance lit up with confidence and as it reached its conclusion Arjuna was a transformed man, battle ready.
 With the sounding of the first conch shell which the commander of the Kauravas, the great and wise Bhishm blew the Mahabharata had begun and the Kauravas by doing so had become the aggressors. Krishna by revealing the Gita to Arjuna had succeeded in restoring the true attributes of this warrior who was now leading the war and would eventually, despite the smallness of his army, marshal such to victory in the epic war.
 It was not the last time that Gita had guided a warrior to victory, in modern times another Arjuna , the half clad fakir , the Mahatma , the great soul Gandhi’s faith on the guidance of  Gita  eventually forced the sun to set upon the British empire . Gita is a great book for the humans as it deals with the senses, mind, reason and atman and how such team up to take command of or submit to a situation and its following is not an exclusive domain of any faith, it teaches the Dharma of a human. Those that understand it rise to great heights.  Narendra Modi , it appears owes a lot to this book as he presents copies to world leaders. His rise from a state of obscurity to international relevance has to do much with Gita only that some of his followers; it appears have not found reason to go properly into the teachings of this great book. Some who read this book half heartedly find wrong contexts for its use. Godse was one of them and he assassinated the great soul, the Mahatma, Gandhi. Democracies also have lessons to take from Gita , varying ideologies have the right to be pursued and propagated , in the end it is the sovereign,  the people who decide which ideology they would follow and the leaders they would accept.

No comments:

Post a Comment