Saturday, 16 January 2016

The Pakistani Islamic bomb, the threat it constitutes ……..continued


Within hours of the earlier article on this subject which was blogged, the mastermind of Bombay attack preached more terror in a congregation of the Jamat-ud-dawa, the cloaked terrorist outfit headquartered in Pakistan. He said and be it quoted, “Allah sent the Nabi, the Prophet and He did not send him unarmed, He gave him a sword to bring the “kefirs”, the non-believers into submission. The world had to be cleared of all non believers. I invite you to this “Dawate Zihaad” the feast for the war against the non believers. Earlier India and Israel were the only two targets, but now our missiles have the entire globe in their reach.” The nuclear missiles, it appears now is the sword which this mullah appears to be referring to.

 The world may have taken out Osama and may be well on the way to taking Baghdadi but unless the thought that generates this threat that grows under the undeterred patronage of Pakistan is checked, the threat will continue and grow. Pakistan has to be brought upon to realize that it is time it removed the terror camps and schools from its land or be prepared for a united global response and bear the consequences. This nation which was not shamed enough for having deceived the world on Osama, continues to conduct itself with the same deception and denial even as the terror preachers reach out to the radical minds openly and unchecked from open congregations in Pakistan.
 The question is not when this sword which the Maulwi has referred to in the open congregation and widely reported in Pak media is used against the consciousness opposed to radical Islam, what is worrying is the unfathomable manner in which these engineers of destruction choose to use it in the background of the assault on the Twin towers and the attack in Mumbai, Gurdaspur, Pathankot, London, Paris and across the world. We did see this coming but realized the horrific intent of this thought and the package in which it came, only when the planes with innocent men, women, and children were converted into missiles to strike the twin towers, the Indian Parliament, and Mumbai. The radical aggressive mind each time was the same only that Pakistan pretended to be uninvolved.
 This outfit managed by Hafiz Sayeed, which poses as a trustee for peoples’ welfare and operates from Pakistan, has the active assistance of the Punjab government of Pakistan, which funds its activities along with others. The Pakistani Prime Minister’s brother heads the Government in Punjab. The preacher’s discourse at the congregation clearly drew its audacious confidence from its patron Pakistan and the Islamic nuclear stockpile which Pakistan sits over, exporting terror. This discourse was not an isolated one. Hidden somewhere else in Pakistan another Mullah, the founder leader of Jaish-e- Muhammad eulogized the perpetrators of the Pathankot attack even as he promises more in the days to come in line with the Pak strategy of coercive engagement. Jaish-e-Muhammad continues to be a terror outfit, which was banned long ago and its activities are now under the patronage of the Pakistani radar. The question, “how have these terror centers continued to exist and function on this so called “Pious land” even after being banned.”
Pakistan has taken strong exception to President Obama’s observation that this country will continue to be unstable for a long time and also continue to breed and export terrorism, threatening peace and security across the world. There is reason in the President’s opinion because terrorism is embedded deep in the thought and ideology of the devil acting as the self proclaimed attorney of God, and in His name cultivates the ignorant into a cult. This can have a devastating potential if allowed to breed and grow.
 The situation is serious because a sovereign nation chooses to harbor these enemies of humanity on its soil and its foreign secretary finds the US President’s observations unrealistic. Pakistan itself requires to wake up to reality before things really go out of its control and the “non-state actors “that it refers to, ultimately replace any remaining semblance of governance left and take control of its strategic assets including its nuclear stockpile.

No comments:

Post a Comment