Is Hinduism
really threatened?
As one visits the social media sites one increasingly
encounters a sense of anxiety among some sections of the Hindus. There are
clearly two trends to such anxiety one caused by the violent methods of the
advocates of the Caliphate and the other occasioned by the needs of
polarization on the eve of elections. The relevant question in the given
situation is whether the Hindus that are anxious do really know what Hinduism
is about or is their response to the presumed threat over stretched.
Hinduism as one understands through the Gita and the Upanishads
is a way to self actualization, the state of eternal bliss and the end purpose
of the Vedas. A realized Hindu in a state of realization would be in a state of
bliss rather than in a state of eternal anxiety. All the paths namely Bhakti,
Japa, Dhyan and Gyana converge on one truth “the true inner self “ ,the
consciousness , that propels the inert attributes, the senses, the mind the
Buddhi which are dynamic only so long as they are in sync with the true “inner
self “, “ the atman “. The Bhagwad Gita , which is a treatment of the
Upanishads and the light that they throw on the singular truth that is the “
Atman “ finds all other things untrue more properly described as “Maya “. The central theme of both the Bhagwad
Gita and the Upanishads is the explanation of “tat twam asi “, “that you are “.
The Bhagwad Gita in its eighteen chapters devotes six chapters each to
elucidate the three words that encapsitulate the divine truth, “the Atman “,
“the Brahm “. Serious adherents of Hinduism
have two paths available to them for such realization, the path of Advait which
finds “Brahm “formless and Dwait which sees the same in forms. Irrespective of
the differences in the recourse to enlightenment the journey eventually brings
one to the same truth. While an adherent of Advait would seek the realization
in terms of ‘’ Yoga “ bringing the senses, the mind and the buddhi in sync, the
Dwaiti would seek it through Bhakti which is devotion . While the Advaiti would
seek self realization by first understanding the relevance of the senses, the mind
and the Buddhi and how these elements can organize a personality or disorganize
it, the Dwaiti is given more to customs and rites. Even in such situation the
focused emphasis is on the development of organized human personalities which
can become such only through the disciplining of the senses, the mind by
bringing the two under the command of buddhi, “the Reason”. The true self can only be realized through
such disciplining. A realized Hindu has no cause for anxiety which is more
often bred by here say or some unreasonable spirit of finding one’s own faith
as superior to others. The essence of all religions is promotion of right
conduct that defines the human. Hinduism talks about right conduct as
profoundly described in Gita by Krishna to Arjuna on the eve of the epic battle
Mahabharata. Buddhism talks about right conduct as it gives the eight truths;
Jainism also lays emphasis on it and so do Christianity and Islam. The right
conduct in the given scenario is to leave all that is unlawful and provocative
to the Arms of the state and secure the essence of religions and stand up to
any misinterpretation of the scriptures by vested interests.
Reverting to Hinduism one has to bear in mind that it
believes in the unity of souls and that being the underlying truth no human
irrespective of the faith he or she pursues, can be viewed differently or less
religious. If Brahm, the consciousness is the sole propeller of all, otherwise
inert, what scope remains for an enlightened Hindu to allow anxiety occasioned
by different hues and colors, to prey on him?
The movement of the Indian state has been a movement of
convictions and its faith in its secular spirit. The line between the state and
religion is clearly drawn. The state would not interfere in the affairs of
religions and would encourage their promotion but would also not tolerate any
design of any religion that undermines it. A strong and reasonable state that
India is, given its one and only religious book “the Constitution “, as stated
often by the Prime minister and quite recently in the US Congress by him, is
fully enabled to deal with sections, which through their deliberate
misinterpretation of faiths tend to increasingly become irreligious towards the
state and its peace loving and law abiding citizens circulating material that
offends and threatens its integrity. Hinduism is a concept worth imbibing
rather than being quixotically anxious about.